Outdoor
How high can a retaining wall be without a permit?
The 4 ft line starts underground, so the wall you can see is shorter than the number.
On this page (10 sections)
- What a retaining wall is, and what the 4 ft counts
- 4 ft in the IRC and IBC, word for word
- Why only about 3 ft of the wall shows
- "Unless supporting a surcharge": the word that cancels the exemption
- Eight rulebooks, two starting points for the tape
- Worked through: one wall under eight rulebooks
- Two low walls can count as one tall one
- A fence or a guard on top, and the setback from the line
- Steps through the wall, and the rules beside it
- Where these numbers stop applying
Short answer
4 ft (1,219 mm), measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, under both US model codes and California's. The footing is buried, so only about 3 ft to 3 ft 8 in (0.91 to 1.12 m) of wall shows above the ground. A surcharge, such as a driveway or a slope above the wall, ends the exemption at any height. Towns move the line: Bayville, New York stops at 24 in (610 mm), Abbotsford, BC at 1.2 m.
The numbers, at a glance
- IRC and IBC 2021, US model codes
- 4 ft (1,219 mm) to the bottom of the footingR105.2 and 105.2: "unless supporting a surcharge"
- California Residential Code 2025
- 4 ft (1,219 mm), same wordsR105.2
- Wall that shows above ground at the 4 ft line
- About 3 ft to 3 ft 8 in (0.91 to 1.12 m)12 in footing, or Allan Block's buried course and pad
- Worcester, Massachusetts
- Less than 4 ft (1.22 m), footing includedA wall of exactly 4 ft needs a permit
- Bayville, New York
- 24 in (610 mm) or lessMeasured from the lowest ground beside the wall
- Abbotsford, British Columbia
- Under 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in)Terraced walls added together unless spaced apart
- Central Okanagan, British Columbia
- 1.5 m (4 ft 11 in), from the bottom of the foundationWalls under 2.0 m apart are added together
- Australian Capital Territory
- 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in), or 1.5 m (4 ft 11 in) on conditionsMeasured to the lowest adjacent ground
- IRC R404.4, engineered design
- Over 48 in (1,219 mm) of fill, or over 24 in (610 mm) with extra loadsSafety factor 1.5 against sliding and overturning
A retaining wall can be 4 ft (1,219 mm) high without a building permit under both US model codes. But the codes measure that height "from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall". The footing is buried, so the part of the wall you see is shorter. On a common footing, only about 3 ft to 3 ft 8 in (0.91 to 1.12 m) shows above the ground. And if the wall holds up a driveway, a slope or a building, it needs a permit at any height. The code calls that extra load a surcharge. Towns move the line in both directions, as the rulebooks below show, and the rest of the garden is in outdoor room dimensions.
What a retaining wall is, and what the 4 ft counts#
A retaining wall holds back soil. The ground on one side is higher than on the other, and the wall stops the high side from sliding down. The Central Okanagan in British Columbia, in its retaining walls brochure, puts it simply: "a structure that holds or retains soil or other material behind it". A wall with level ground on both sides is a freestanding wall, not a retaining wall.
A footing is the wide base the wall stands on. For a poured concrete wall it is a slab of concrete under the wall. For a block wall it is the packed gravel pad and the first course of blocks, set in a trench. Either way it sits below the ground.
A building permit is approval from your town's building department. It says a structure meets the building code. An inspector checks it.
The height that sets the permit line depends on where you start the tape. There are two ways in use:
- From the bottom of the footing. The US model codes, California, Worcester and the Central Okanagan count the buried part.
- From the lowest ground beside the wall. Bayville, New York and the Australian Capital Territory count only what shows on the low side.
The same wall can pass one way and fail the other.
4 ft in the IRC and IBC, word for word#
The International Residential Code (IRC) covers houses. Section R105.2 of the 2021 edition lists work that needs no permit. Under "Building", the third item reads:
"Retaining walls that are not over 4 feet (1219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge."
The International Building Code (IBC) covers every other kind of building. Section 105.2 of its 2021 edition carries the same item and adds one more case: "or impounding Class I, II or IIIA liquids". Those are the IBC's classes of flammable and combustible liquids, so a wall that holds back fuel, not soil, never gets the exemption.
California's 2025 Residential Code keeps the IRC sentence unchanged in its own R105.2. "Not over" is the test in all three, so a wall of exactly 4 ft is exempt under the model text.
Why only about 3 ft of the wall shows#
Because the 4 ft starts at the bottom of the footing, the buried part comes off the top. How much is buried depends on the wall.
A wall on a 12 in footing. A California code guide gives this case: a block wall that "shows 3 feet 6 inches of face, sitting on a 12-inch-thick footing buried below grade, is a 4-foot-6-inch wall" and needs a permit. Turn it around. With a 12 in (305 mm) footing below the ground, the most face you can show is 36 in (914 mm).
Stacked block. Allan Block's install guide sets the trench for a wall under 4 ft at 4 in (100 mm) of packed gravel, "plus additional to account for the amount of buried block needed". The buried block is 1 in (25 mm) for each 1 ft (300 mm) of wall height. Worked out for a wall at the 4 ft line:
| Block wall at the 4 ft line | Gravel pad counted | Gravel pad not counted |
|---|---|---|
| Pad below the first block | 4 in (100 mm) | 4 in (100 mm), not counted |
| Block stack, buried and visible | 44 in (1.12 m) | 48 in (1.22 m) |
| Buried block, 1 in per ft | About 3 3/4 in (95 mm) | 4 in (100 mm) |
| Face above the ground | About 40 in, 3 ft 4 in (1.02 m) | 44 in, 3 ft 8 in (1.12 m) |
Whether the gravel pad counts as the footing is the building official's call, so ask. Either way, a 4 ft code wall shows 3 ft to 3 ft 8 in. Someone who builds 4 ft of visible block has built a wall of about 4 ft 4 in to 4 ft 8 in by the code's tape, and that needs a permit.
"Unless supporting a surcharge": the word that cancels the exemption#
A surcharge is any load on the soil behind the wall beyond the soil itself. Neither the IRC nor the IBC defines the word. The California guide lists what it usually means in a yard:
- ground that keeps rising behind the wall instead of levelling off,
- a driveway, parking pad or road above the wall,
- a shed, a deck footing, a pool or the house near the top of the wall,
- another retaining wall stepped above this one.
If any of those is there, the US exemption is gone, however short the wall. A 2 ft (610 mm) wall under a driveway needs a permit in the model code, while a 4 ft wall under a flat lawn does not.
The IRC says the same thing from the design side. Section R404.4 requires an engineered design for a wall "exceeding 24 inches (610 mm) in height that resist[s] lateral loads in addition to soil". It also requires one for a wall that is not braced at the top and holds back more than 48 in (1,219 mm) of unbalanced fill, meaning the difference in soil height between the two sides. The design must hold against sliding and overturning with a safety factor of 1.5. So the permit line and the design line share a number, 48 in, though one counts the footing and the other counts soil. A surcharge drops the design line to 24 in.
Canada has its own version. The Central Okanagan requires a permit for a wall that "supports a road or lane" at any height.
Eight rulebooks, two starting points for the tape#
Local rules change the height, the wording and the starting point. Here are the ones compared on this page.
| Rulebook | Permit-free up to | Measured from | Also needs a permit |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRC 2021, R105.2 | Not over 4 ft (1,219 mm) | Bottom of the footing | Any surcharge |
| IBC 2021, 105.2 | Not over 4 ft (1,219 mm) | Bottom of the footing | Surcharge; Class I, II or IIIA liquids |
| California Residential Code 2025 | Not over 4 ft (1,219 mm) | Bottom of the footing | Any surcharge |
| Worcester, Massachusetts | Less than 4 ft (1.22 m) | Bottom of the footing | Nothing more stated |
| Bayville, New York | 24 in (610 mm) or less | Lowest ground beside the wall | Any change to storm water flow |
| Abbotsford, British Columbia | Under 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in) | Not stated in the text | A series of walls over 1.2 m in total |
| Central Okanagan, British Columbia | 1.5 m (4 ft 11 in) | Bottom of the foundation | Road or lane, riparian or floodplain area |
| Australian Capital Territory | 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in); 1.5 m (4 ft 11 in) on conditions | Lowest ground beside the wall | Over 1.5 m |
Worcester, Massachusetts keeps the footing datum but changes one word. Its FAQ says walls "less than 4 feet in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall do not require a building permit". Less than 4 ft is not the same as not over 4 ft. At exactly 4 ft the two part.
Bayville, New York goes much lower. Its village code says a permit is needed for "any retaining wall with a height greater than 24 inches". A lower wall needs one too if the wall or its regrading "alters the flow of stormwater or surface water". Height is "measured from the lowest point on the abutting grade", and no wall or tier may top 4 ft. Every wall that needs a permit must be designed by a licensed engineer or architect.
Abbotsford, British Columbia needs a permit at "1.2 m (3.9 ft) in height or greater", and an engineer to design the wall. The FAQ text does not say where the height starts. Its drawings mark each wall's height on the exposed face, but confirm that with the city before you rely on it.
Central Okanagan, British Columbia. The regional district needs a permit if "any part of it is greater than 1.5m in height as measured from the bottom of the foundation to the top of the retaining structure". Its land use bylaws cap any retaining wall at 2.5 m (8 ft 2 in).
Australian Capital Territory. The Building (General) Regulation 2008 lists a "retaining wall up to 1.2m high when measured from any point at top of retaining wall to lowest adjacent ground level" as exempt from building approval. A wall up to 1.5 m is exempt too, on a condition: it must meet the exempt building code, or else the deemed-to-satisfy rules of the building code. A few sections of the Building Act still apply to it. Planning rules in the ACT are separate and are not covered here.
Worked through: one wall under eight rulebooks#
Take one wall and walk it through each rule. Suppose a poured concrete wall holds up a flat lawn, with nothing heavy near the top. It shows 42 in (1.07 m) above the low ground. It stands on a 12 in (305 mm) footing buried under that ground, so by the footing it is 54 in (1.37 m). Then cut the same wall down to a 36 in (914 mm) face, which is exactly 48 in (1,219 mm) by the footing. Each cell repeats a ruling made above.
| Rulebook | 42 in face, 54 in with footing | 36 in face, 48 in with footing |
|---|---|---|
| IRC and IBC 2021, California 2025 | Permit: over 4 ft by the footing | No permit: not over 4 ft |
| Worcester, Massachusetts | Permit: not less than 4 ft | Permit: exactly 4 ft is not less than 4 ft |
| Bayville, New York | Permit: over 24 in from the low ground | Permit: over 24 in from the low ground |
| Abbotsford, British Columbia | No permit by the face, 1.07 m; 1.37 m with footing would need one | No permit by the face, 0.91 m; 1.22 m with footing would need one |
| Central Okanagan, British Columbia | No permit: 1.37 m is under 1.5 m | No permit: 1.22 m is under 1.5 m |
| Australian Capital Territory | No approval: 1.07 m is under 1.2 m | No approval: 0.91 m is under 1.2 m |
The 42 in wall fails every US rule, because 12 in of concrete underground pushes it past 4 ft. Yet it passes both rules that measure from the low ground, and the Central Okanagan's higher 1.5 m line. At 36 in of face, the wall passes the model codes with nothing to spare. Worcester still wants a permit, on one word, and Bayville wants one and a guard.
Put a driveway on top of either wall and the US answers change. The model codes then need a permit at any height, and R404.4 calls for an engineer once the wall is over 24 in.
Two low walls can count as one tall one#
Terracing a slope into two short walls is a common way to stay under the line. Local rules often add the walls together when they sit close.
- Abbotsford, British Columbia needs no permit if the two walls add up to less than 1.2 m. It also allows two walls each under 1.2 m when the gap between them is twice the height of the lower wall. Soil dug out in the build must stay at least twice the top wall's height back from it.
- Central Okanagan, British Columbia says walls "shall not be closer than 2.0m apart". If they are, "the wall height measurement will be the sum of each wall height".
- Bayville, New York wants tiers at least 4 ft (1.22 m) apart, each no more than 4 ft, with the ground between them landscaped.
The US model codes say nothing about tiers. But a wall stepped above another is on the California guide's surcharge list, so the lower wall can lose the exemption anyway. A pair of 2 ft walls 2 ft apart is not two exempt walls in every place.
Terraces often turn into beds. A wall that holds a raised bed is a retaining wall too, and the bed widths and soil depths are in planter and raised bed dimensions.
A fence or a guard on top, and the setback from the line#
A wall with a drop beside it often needs something on top, and that changes the height count too.
Guards. Bayville requires "a fence or guardrail at least three feet in height above the top of said wall" on walls over 30 in (762 mm) that hold a walkable surface. The 30 in figure matches the IRC's guard trigger for decks, set out in deck sizes and railing heights.
Fences. Abbotsford counts the wall as part of the fence height when the two are less than 1.0 m (3 ft 3 in) apart, unless the building code requires a guard there. The Central Okanagan caps a fence on a retaining wall at 1.3 m (4 ft 3 in). The zoning caps on the fence itself, front and back, are in how tall a fence can be without a permit.
Setbacks. A setback is the distance a structure must stand back from the property line. Bayville sets 1 ft back for each foot of height where the wall stands above a neighbour's ground, and 10 ft (3.05 m) where any part is below it. Abbotsford lets a wall under 1.2 m sit anywhere on the lot outside easements. The Central Okanagan allows walls under 1.5 m inside any setback, but a wall over 2 m (6 ft 7 in) must be 1 m (3 ft 3 in) from a side or rear line.
Steps through the wall, and the rules beside it#
A wall that splits a garden into two levels needs a way between them. Steps built into the wall follow the outdoor stride rule in garden path widths and outdoor step dimensions, and the stair rise and run calculator divides any height into equal risers. A 36 in (914 mm) change of level takes six 6 in (152 mm) risers.
The same split between a permit line and the rules that apply anyway runs through do I need a permit to build a deck and how big a shed can be without a permit. Mark the wall line and the terrace at full size before you dig, as in taping out a layout.
Where these numbers stop applying#
The figures here are the 2021 IRC and IBC model text, the 2025 California Residential Code and the rules of the places named, as each publishes them. Your own town may differ from all of them, and its wording decides. A state can amend the model text, and so can a city. Grading, drainage and storm water permits are separate tracks and can apply when the wall itself is exempt, as Bayville shows. A homeowners' association, a deed covenant or a lease can be stricter, and none is covered. Neither is planning law in the ACT, or any part of Australia, Canada or the UK beyond the places named.
A permit-free wall is not a checked wall. The exemption leaves out the inspection, not the code: R105.2 says it does not authorise work "in violation of the provisions of this code". Drainage, the footing, the material and the soil are still the owner's risk, and none is covered here. Where the soil is soft or wet, or the slope is steep, ask an engineer before choosing a height, whatever the permit line says.
Metric figures are the sources' own where they print them and conversions otherwise, as imperial and metric dimension systems explains, and the unit converter does the rest. Terms such as guard and grade are defined in the glossary, and the codes behind this page are indexed under standards and codes.
Frequently asked questions#
Do I need a permit for a 3 foot retaining wall?
Under the US model codes, not if the whole wall, footing included, is 4 ft (1,219 mm) or less and nothing heavy sits above it. A 3 ft (0.91 m) face on a 12 in (305 mm) footing is exactly 4 ft, so it passes the model text. It fails in Worcester, Massachusetts, which says less than 4 ft, and in Bayville, New York, where any wall over 24 in (610 mm) needs a permit.
How is retaining wall height measured for a permit?
In the US model codes, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, so the buried part counts. Worcester, Massachusetts and the Central Okanagan in British Columbia also count from the bottom of the footing or foundation. Bayville, New York and the Australian Capital Territory measure from the lowest ground beside the wall instead, which counts only what shows on the low side.
What is a surcharge on a retaining wall?
A load on the soil behind the wall beyond the soil itself. Neither the IRC nor the IBC defines the word. A California code guide lists rising ground behind the wall, a driveway or parking pad above it, a shed, deck footing, pool or house near the top, and a second wall stepped above. Any of these ends the US permit exemption, whatever the wall's height.
Do terraced retaining walls need a permit?
They can, because two close walls may count as one. Abbotsford, BC adds the heights unless each wall is under 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in) and the gap between them is twice the lower wall's height. The Central Okanagan adds the heights of walls under 2.0 m (6 ft 7 in) apart. Bayville, New York wants tiers at least 4 ft (1.22 m) apart, each no taller than 4 ft.
Can I put a fence on top of a retaining wall?
Yes, but the rules may count the two together. Abbotsford, BC adds the wall to the fence height when the two are less than 1.0 m (3 ft 3 in) apart, unless the building code requires a guard there. The Central Okanagan caps a fence on a retaining wall at 1.3 m (4 ft 3 in). Bayville, New York requires a fence or guardrail at least 3 ft (0.91 m) high on some walls over 30 in (762 mm).
When does a retaining wall need an engineer?
Under IRC R404.4, when it is not braced at the top and holds back more than 48 in (1,219 mm) of soil, or when it is over 24 in (610 mm) high and carries loads besides soil. The design must resist sliding and overturning with a safety factor of 1.5. Bayville, New York wants every wall that needs a permit, so anything over 24 in, designed by an engineer or architect.
How high can a retaining wall be without approval in Canberra?
Up to 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in) with no building approval in the Australian Capital Territory, measured from any point on the top of the wall to the lowest ground beside it. A wall up to 1.5 m (4 ft 11 in) is also exempt, but it must meet the exempt building code or the building code's deemed-to-satisfy rules, and some sections of the Building Act still apply.
Sources and standards referenced#
- Residential Code 2021 (adopts the 2021 IRC), section R105.2 Work exempt from permit Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control, via UpCodes"Retaining walls that are not over 4 feet (1219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge"; the exemption does not authorise work that breaks the code or local law
- Building Code 2021 (adopts the 2021 IBC), section 105.2 Work exempt from permit Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control, via UpCodesThe same 4 ft item, adding "or impounding Class I, II or IIIA liquids"
- Residential Code 2021 (adopts the 2021 IRC), section R404.4 Retaining walls Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control, via UpCodesEngineered design for walls not laterally supported at the top retaining over 48 in (1219 mm) of unbalanced fill, or over 24 in (610 mm) resisting lateral loads in addition to soil; safety factor 1.5
- Do retaining walls require a building permit? City of Worcester, Massachusetts"Retaining walls less than 4 feet in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall do not require a building permit"
- Code of the Village of Bayville, chapter 80, Article XIIIA Retaining Walls Village of Bayville, New York (L.L. No. 1-2010), via Zoneomics§ 80-67.1 permit over 24 in, Planning Board at 8 ft; § 80-67.2 setbacks, guard 3 ft over 30 in, engineer's design; § 80-67.3 each tier 4 ft from the lowest abutting grade, tiers 4 ft apart
- Frequently Asked Questions: Retaining Walls City of Abbotsford, British ColumbiaBuilding permit and engineer at 1.2 m (3.9 ft) or greater, or a series over 1.2 m in total; terraces exempt if combined under 1.2 m, or each under 1.2 m and spaced twice the lower wall's height; fence counted with the wall within 1.0 m
- Building (General) Regulation 2008, Schedule 1, Part 1.3, items 4 and 5 (republication 53, effective 10 November 2026) ACT Parliamentary Counsel, legislation.act.gov.auRetaining wall up to 1.2 m, and up to 1.5 m on conditions, "measured from any point at top of retaining wall to lowest adjacent ground level"
We cite published codes, industry planning guidelines and manufacturer specifications. Where a figure is our own recommendation rather than a published standard, the text says so. See how we measure.